By Ian Long This article is a trailer for my Writing Horror workshop on Friday 13th of June. Pathos is a feeling of pity or sadness – the stirring of tender, melancholy emotions. We may not always associate these sentiments with horror, which is all about aversion, hostility and threat. But when ‘monsters’ have the quality of pathos - when they can make us feel for them, even pity them - their stories become particularly poignant and memorable. Think of Frankenstein, King Kong, Carrie, The Fly, and The Substance. The monsters in these films may be scary, but we empathise with them. At times, perhaps more than we do with their victims. And as our minds deal with the 'cognitive dissonance' of these seemingly irreconcilable emotional contradictions, we enter a deeper, more long-lasting state of unease than would result from a simple shock. The French horror film Eyes Without a Face (Georges Franju, 1960) creates pathos around an objectively monstrous character, and demonstrates how this can make for a haunting and memorable story. It’s a paradox of a film: restrained and dreamlike, but with disturbing ideas which look forward to something as extreme as Pascal Augier’s Martyrs (2008), and much of its power comes from its balancing of conflicting emotions. The Plot An eminent cosmetic surgeon is developing advanced skin-grafting procedures with ‘rejuvenating’ effects, using animals for his experiments. But when his daughter is facially disfigured in a road accident, he has the excuse he needs to try out his methods on human subjects. He kidnaps young women and tries to graft their faces onto his daughter. Each attempt fails, and each failure signals the death of the unwilling ‘donor’. Faces and their expressions are central to the film, which can be read as a dark commentary on the notion that the value of women rests solely on their beauty. The Evil Doctor – Génessier Dr. Génessier is probably one of the most depraved characters in cinema. As well as his murders and medical crimes, he commits many side transgressions which show a psychopathic disregard for human norms:
But Génessier doesn’t fully fit the cliché of the crazed ‘mad scientist’. He's ice-cold, inscrutable, always in control. He knows what he’s doing. The Mutilated Daughter – Christiane Génessier’s flesh-and-blood face is as impassive as a mask throughout the film. But Christiane’s fragile features – which actually are a mask – somehow communicate a wide range of emotions. Her passivity makes it hard to determine her attitude to her father's actions, but we project a range of feelings onto her. We feel - or hope - that she can see his evil. However, there's a chilling moment when she caresses the cheek of a girl who lies, unconscious, on his operating table. Does Christine crave her perfect face? Or is she feeling sympathy for another of her father's prisoners? The Corrupt Helper – Louise The film begins with a woman driving to a riverside location, dragging a body from her car and dumping it in the water. The woman is Louise, one of Génessier’s previous patients. He saved her from disfigurement and she repaid him by becoming his procuress, luring young women she meets on the streets of Paris to his mansion-clinic. Louise is played by Alida Valli, best-known for playing Anna, Harry Lime’s girlfriend in The Third Man (Carol Reed, 1949). Valli is known as one of 20th century cinema's great beauties, and the fact that she - of all people - is knowingly enticing innocent girls to disfigurement and death gives the story an extra level of cruelty and sadism. The Wary Victim – Edna Louise overhears a young woman called Edna saying she needs a new place to live. She befriends the girl, and offers to drive her to see a room she can rent. Inevitably, Louise's destination is Génessier’s mansion. At first, Edna half-trusts Louise. But she begins to sense something false in her ingratiating manner. Edna doesn’t want to be driven so far outside Paris. She doesn't want the room Louise is offering. She just wants to go home. We study her troubled expression, hoping she'll ask Louise to stop the car, get out, and go back. But something overrides her survival instincts. The episode proves that seeing a character half-suspecting the danger they're in, but ignoring their misgivings, can be more gruelling than watching one who is entirely oblivious of their predicament. Edna’s tension mirrors our own. But what she suspects, we know. The moment of pathos Christiane finally rebels against Génessier's dominion. She attacks Louise, stabbing her in the throat (where she wears a pearl choker to cover the scars caused by Génessier's operation) with a scalpel (the tool of his trade). Louise's response to this is truly disturbing. She doesn't become angry or try to fight Christine, as we might expect. Instead, her eyes fill with tears. She sinks to the floor, dying, and simply says: "Pourquoi?" ("Why?") It's a fleeting moment with huge character significance. Through it, we finally understand Christine's enigmatic motives. Louise is unquestionably a monster. But she's less concerned with her fatal injury and imminent death than with the emotional wound of Christine turning on her. Louise seems to be saying: “I degraded myself for you. I made myself into something less than human. But I did it out of love. It was my way of caring. If you couldn’t see that, it was all for nothing. Now I'm dying, I know my life was meaningless.” To sum up Like a lot of good horror films, Eyes Without a Face has the bold simplicity of a fairytale. There are clear echoes of Hansel and Gretel, Beauty and the Beast, The Babes in the Woods, and others. It's a story that both resolves and doesn’t quite resolve, taking us to a strange place, leaving us there, and percolating in our minds long after we watch it. Which is the mark of a good film of any kind. My Writing Horror workshop on Friday June 13th We'll be exploring lots of other horror topics and ideas. The aim is to inspire great new stories in the genre. Places are limited, so book now to avoid disappointment.
9 Comments
Clive Ford
15/5/2025 09:09:03 pm
Great article, I will have to watch it again. I remember it was a deeply unsettling and very nightmarish movie. If you liked that you should definitely check out this, another movie about a plastic surgeon with a God complex.
Reply
Anouche
16/5/2025 05:02:19 pm
Thank you for this great article, Ian. I so enjoyed it and 'discovering' Eyes Without a Face, and that 'Horror' is a complex genre. I can't wait to see the film!
Reply
Juan
20/5/2025 04:43:05 pm
Brilliant article! I'm not a big fan of horror, but coincidentally all the characters you mention with a pathos are films/books I really like. So, maybe that's the secret ingredient after all.
Reply
ALAN PRICE
22/5/2025 09:05:48 am
Alidi Valli's "Why?" still haunts me to this day. A very good examination of Franju's EYES WITHOUT A FACE. Thank you, very much, Ian.
Reply
Thanks a lot for your thoughts and the link to your review of the blu-ray, Alan, which is really interesting, I agree, the sequence of photographs showing the deterioration of Christiane's grafted-on face is truly heartbreaking.
Reply
Lára Marteinsdóttir
23/5/2025 09:51:04 pm
Well, in short, for me at least, this dark fable has become remarkably poignant today, as it crystallizes in essence the primary archetypes and the collective unconscious shadow to which we all are shackled. The attempted normalization of the self-inflicted-violence of plastic surgery, botox, lip fillers, nip and tucks etc. among perfectly normal looking young women today, is now this cognitive dissonance you mentioned, where women have completely accepted the masculine value of them. That their worth lies in their faces, never to show a mark of aging (wrinkles brought on by aging and experience) to remain forever-young in a permanent Peter Pan state (puella aeterneus here instead of the puer of course). The Doctor/Father in the film IS the Monster, and simultaneously the Patriarchal norms, his female assistant, is a normal person in today´s world of plastic surgery collective neurosis. This classic, once considered horror film, is now a realistic uncovering of a dark truth that exposes how feminism has seriously failed in demanding a space for an authentic version of the Feminine Psyche to rise within us all, with all its multi-faceted aspects and depths, and how patriarchy/tech-bros are drowning us all in a period where Narcissus and Echo rule the show ( Selfies, Echo chambers etc.) Aphrodite/Venus has become a confused mixture on social media/tv/films, where she has herself has become the whore, rather than becoming a wise old hag, with an enormous power.. This film shows the power of Fairy Tales and Mythology, for without them we become fundamentalists.
Reply
Thank you for these thoughts, Lara! It's so telling that this film has continued to accumulate layers of meaning over the years, as any good fable or dark fairytale should.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
BLOGTHE ONLY PLACE TO TALK ABOUT THE CRAFT OF SCRIPTWRITING. Archives
May 2025
|